-
Upload photo
Re-upload
Accepting: jpg, png. Max file size: 10 MB
Sourcing Knowledge Center / Smart Sourcing / What is the difference between OEM, ODM and CM ?
By Dan Harris
This post outlines how creating a clear manufacturing agreement can alleviate the various legal issues inherent in manufacturing overseas. Before we discuss the key terms for your manufacturing contract, we will briefly address why it is so important to have such a contract at all, even in countries with weak legal systems.
Most manufacturing contracts we draft involve one of three different types of manufacturing arrangements: Original Equipment Manufacturing (OEM), Contract Manufacturing (CM), and Original Design Manufacturing (ODM). This post examines how these three different arrangements influence various legal issues inherent to overseas manufacturing.

In this arrangement, the foreign buyer purchases a product from a foreign country factory that is already being manufactured by that factory. The product buyer then “packages” this product with its own trademark and logo. The buyer and the factory may agree to certain cosmetic changes (color, shape, minor added features) that further customize the product for the buyer.
In this sort of OEM arrangement, intellectual property (IP) is usually clear: the buyer owns its branding (trademarks, logos, and packaging) and the factory owns the product. The difficulty arises once the product is customized. Who owns the IP once the buyer has made changes to the product? An OEM agreement can provide clarity here. Usually, the buyer seeks to restrict the factory from using customization in selling the base product to third parties.
As one of the world's largest facilitators of Business to Business (B2B) trade for over 50 years, Global Sources has provided buyers from all over the world access to hot new products as well as qualified B2B lead generation to China manufacturers. You will find tens of thousands of OEM manufacturers on the Global Sources B2B website.
In this arrangement, the foreign buyer has a fully developed product design. Traditionally, this design was of a product that had been manufactured by the buyer in its home country. More recently, the product is a new design being manufactured for the first time overseas. In a CM arrangement, ownership may seem simple: the foreign buyer owns all the IP, both in design and branding, and the factory owns nothing. In practice, however, the division is not always so clear. For example, your factory may change your product’s design and use those design changes to modify its own products it sells in direct competition with your products. Difficulties exist in every contract manufacturing project and they can be resolved with a clear, written agreement.
As outsourced factories are becoming more technically competent, foreign buyers have started entering into arrangements in which their overseas factory does some or all the design work for the product. There are many variations on this ODM approach. In its most fundamental form, the foreign buyer provides drawings and a specification sheet and the overseas factory does the rest of the work in consultation with the buyer.
Under this sort of arrangement, the obvious question is who owns the design of the product? Both the foreign buyer and its overseas factory will claim ownership of the design using conflicting arguments. The overseas factory will agree to make the product on an exclusive basis for the foreign buyer, but the foreign buyer does not have the right to have the product made by a third-party factory. This position can come as a bad surprise to the foreign buyer, particularly when its overseas factory suddenly announces it will be doubling the price for manufacturing the product. These issues can get even more complex when the product incorporates or is based on technology clearly owned by the overseas factory. In this setting, the factory will often state that the buyer can go anywhere it wants to manufacture the buyer’s own portion of the product design, but no third party factory can make use of the factory’s proprietary technology in the manufacturing process. Consider this case for a foreign buyer who has spent considerable time and effort developing a product design only to learn after a year that it's overseas factory has decided to terminate the manufacturing agreement.
Once again, the only way to resolve these issues is to confront them in advance with a detailed written ODM agreement that sets out a resolution to these issues that is fair to both sides. There is no simple, legal default answer to any of these difficult issues. Or, rather, the legal default in most countries will favor the position of the overseas factory. Absent a clear agreement on how to proceed, the foreign buyer will lose pretty much every time.
Also Read: How to safely source and sell products on GlobalSources.com

There are three reasons why it makes sense to have a contract with your manufacturer and only one of those reasons is enforceability in court:
If your foreign manufacturer believes your manufacturing contract will be enforced it likely will act accordingly. Similarly, if your foreign manufacturer believes no court will enforce your manufacturing contract, it likely will act accordingly.
Asia has become the main location for start-up companies with an innovative product concept but no manufacturing facility. The most common form of ODM for foreign start-ups in Asia is some form of co-development. Under the old model of co-development, IP ownership was clear: the foreign entity paid the fee and had 100% ownership of the product. The issue our manufacturing lawyers keep encountering is that the legal consciousness of the parties to these transactions is stuck in the old model of straight development for a fee. But the issues that arise under the new, co-development model are quite different from the former “straight” development model.
The basic issues to consider in an overseas co-development project are as follows:
Though these five issues are normally difficult to resolve, they actually are the easy part of the process. The more difficult issue is who owns what with respect to the intellectual property in the product. Determining that your overseas factory owns 50% and you own 50% may be relevant for allocating income from the commercialization of the IP, but it does not tell you anything useful on the practical level of manufacturing the product
A foreign buyer that wishes to move its production to a different factory can legally do so only if it own s100% of the IP; if the overseas factory owns part of all of the IP the foreign buyer cannot legally switch its production to a new factory without a license or permission from its overseas factory.
Overseas factories will usually take the following positions regarding IP:
If your overseas factory takes the “you cannot go anywhere else” approach you will need to consider critical issues that arise at the production stage. Specifically, you will need to consider what will happen in the following common situations:
When these things happen, the remedy is to move to a different factory. Your ability to switch to a new overseas factory is what keeps your existing overseas factory “under control.” Now consider the situation where you cannot move your production to a different overseas factory. This puts you at the mercy of the factory and this is a situation you must avoid. For more on why it is so important to avoid this sort of situation, check out, China and The Internet of Things and How to Destroy Your Own Company, where we talk about companies that have come to our law firm too late.
The international standard for dealing with the above intellectual property manufacturing issues is as follows:
Though the above provisions are both fair and standard in international custom design and manufacturing, many overseas manufacturers refuse to discuss these matters or to accept a reasonable solution. The overseas factory knows its foreign buyer will be stuck and stuck is exactly where it wants its foreign buyer to be. Being stuck with a factory that behaves unreasonably is an unpleasant and usually very expensive experience. You should consider carefully whether you want to proceed in that kind of situation.
You do not want to be ambushed by these critical issues after you have spent considerable time and money in developing a product with a factory that will then hold you, hostage, at the production stage. See China and The Internet of Things and How to Destroy Your Own Company for a taste of what this can look like.
You need to get clear on these design and manufacturing and pricing and production and intellectual property issues from the start This means you need an ODM agreement that sets forth how they will be resolved.

Dan Harris is the founder of the Harris Bricken law firm, a boutique international law firm focusing on small and medium-sized businesses that operate internationally. China is the fastest-growing area for the firm. Dan writes ChinaLawBlog.com as a source of China legal and business information.
Ultimate Guide to China Sourcing
Sole Sourcing vs Single Sourcing vs Multiple Sourcing Category
Ultimate Guide: In-Depth Insights on Global Sourcing
Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) Explained - Formula & Tips
Ultimate Guide to Buying in Bulk Online
8 Low-cost, High-profit Products to Sell Online in 2023
Source the latest products from verified suppliers via global sourcing platform, and subscribe to our magazines for more in-depth insights and product discovery.
Join the Smart China Sourcing Facebook Group